Skip to main content
Log in

Oddity learning by African dwarf goats ( Capra hircus)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seventeen African dwarf goats (adult females) were trained on oddity tasks using an automated learning device. One odd stimulus and three identical nonodd stimuli were presented on a screen divided into four sectors; the sector for the odd stimulus was varied pseudorandomly. Responses to the odd stimulus were deemed to be correct and were reinforced with food. In phase 1, the goats were trained on eight stimulus configurations. From trial to trial the odd discriminandum was either a + symbol or the letter S, and the nonodd discriminandum was the symbol not used as the odd one. In phase 2, the animals were similarly trained using an unfilled triangle or a filled (i.e., solid black) circle. In phase 3, three new discriminanda were used, an unfilled, small circle with radiating lines, an unfilled heart-shaped symbol, and an unfilled oval; which of the three discriminanda was odd and nonodd was varied from trial to trial. Following these training phases, a transfer test was given, which involved 24 new discriminanda sets. These were presented twice for a total of 48 transfer test trials. Results early in training showed approximately 25% correct, which might be expected by chance in a four-choice task. After 500–2,000 trials, results improved to approximately 40–44% correct. The best-performing subject reached 60–80% correct during training. On the transfer test, this subject had 47.9% correct and that significantly exceeded 25% expected by chance. This finding suggests that some exceptional individuals of African dwarf goats are capable of learning the oddity concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the oddity-from-sample task such evidence was obtained for pigeons (Lombardi et al. 1984), corvid birds (Smirnova et al. 2000) and even honey-bees (Giurfa et al. 2001). Pigeons were also found to solve the same–different discrimination task in which two response keys were associated with the two alternative relations rather than the two presented stimuli (Wright et al. 1984; Wasserman et al. 1995). However, these procedures do not seem to be directly comparable to the oddity task.

References

  • Bailey AM, Thomas RK (1998) An investigation of oddity concept learning by rats. Psychol Rec 48:333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BA (1979) Operant studies on shape discrimination in goats. Physiol Behav 23: 455–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogartz RS (1965) The criterion method: some analyses and remarks. Psychol Bull 64:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd OB, Warren JM (1957) Solution of oddity problems by cats. J Comp Psychol 50:258–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czeschlik T (1998) Animal cognition—the phylogeny and ontogeny of cognitive abilities. Anim Cogn 1:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D´Amato MR, Salmon DP, Colombo M (1985) Extents and limits of the matching concept in monkeys ( Cebus apella) J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 11:35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz H (2001) Zum Einfluss der Trainingsmethode auf das Lernverhalten von Zwergziegen am Computer. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf 44:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz H, Reichart H (1999) Der Feldmonitor—eine neue Möglichkeit der Lernforschung mit Tieren und Ergebnisse bei visuellen Differenzierungsaufgaben von Zwergziegen. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf 42:481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz H, Roitberg E (2001) Ein Vergleich des Lernerfolges von Zwergziegen bei simultaner Zweifach- oder Vierfachwahlmöglichkeit in visuellen Differenzierungsaufgaben. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf 44:661–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz H, Roitberg E, Löhrke B, Nürnberg G, Dietl G, Kinzelbach R (2002) Visual discrimination learning of group housed goats at an automated learning device. Arch Tierz Dummerstorf 45:387–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Friede A (1972) Abstraktionsversuche auf "Gleich" gegen "Ungleich" mit Dohlen. Z Tierpsychol 30:383–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Zhang SW, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan MV (2001) The concepts of 'sameness' and 'difference' in an insect. Nature 410:930–933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow HF (1958) The evolution of learning. In: Roe A, Simpson GG (eds) Behavior and evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 269–290

  • Lock AE, Colombo M (1996) Cognitive abilities in a comparative perspective. In: Lock AE, Peters CRE (eds) Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 596–643

  • Lombardi CM, Fachinelli CG, Delius JD (1984) Oddity of visual patterns conceptualized by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 12:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DR, Harlow HF (1949) The development of transfer of responses to patterning by monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 42:454–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon LE, Harlow HF (1955) Analysis of oddity learning by rhesus monkeys. J Comp Psychol 48:188–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble CS, Thomas RK (1970) Oddity learning in the squirrel monkey. Psychonom Sci 19:305–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore N (1954) Discrimination learning in the canary. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:389–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1987) Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African grey parrot ( Psyttacus erithacus): learning with respect to categories of color shape and material. Anim Learn Behav 15:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B, Dücker G (1959) Versuche über die visuelle Generalisation bei einer Schleichkatze. Z Tierpsychol 16:671–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson EW (1933) A preliminary experiment on abstraction in a monkey. J Comp Psychol 16:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova AA, Lazareva OF, Zorina ZA (2000) Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. J Exp Anal Behav 73:163–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soltysik S, Baldwin B (1972) The performance of goats in triple choice delayed response tasks. Acta Neurobiol Exp 32:73–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strong PN, Hedges M (1966) Comparative studies in simple oddity learning 1 cats racoons monkeys and chimpanzees. Psychonom Sci 5:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK (1980) Evolution of intelligence: an approach to its assessment. Brain Behav Evol 17:452–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK (1996) Investigating cognitive abilities in animals: unrealized potential. Cogn Brain Res 3:157–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK, Boyd MG (1973) A comparison of Cebus albifrons and Saimiri sciureus on oddity performance. Anim Learn Behav 1:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK, Frost T (1983) Oddity and dimension-abstracted oddity (DAO) in squirrel monkeys. Am J Psychol 96:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK, Noble LM (1988) Visual and olfactory oddity learning in rats: what evidence is necessary to show conceptual behavior. Anim Learn Behav 16:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RKR (1995) Natural and relational concepts in animals In: Roitblat HL, Herbert L (eds) Comparative approach to cognitive science. Bradford Books MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp 175–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA (1993) Comparative cognition: beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychol Bull 113:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Hugart JA, Kirkpatrick SK (1995) Pigeons show same–different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 21:248–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DI (1967) Discrimination learning in the pigeon in relation to the number of negative stimuli. Anim Behav 15:79–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Mackintosh NJ, Boakes RA (1985) Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeons and corvids. Q J Exp Psychol 37B:313–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodinsky J, Bitterman ME (1953) The solution of oddity-problems by the rat. Am J Psychol 66:137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright AA, Santiago HC, Urcuioli PJ, Sands SF (1984) Monkey and pigeon acquisition of same/different concept using pictorial stimuli In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior, vol IV. Discrimination processes. Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass., pp 295–317

  • Zerbolio DJ, Royalty JL (1983) Matching and oddity conditional discrimination in the goldfish as avoidance responces: evidence for conceptual avoidance learning. Anim Learn Behav 11:341–348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the expert technical assistance of K. Siebert and D. Sehland and their untiring care for the animals and the training technique. We are thankful to O. Lazareva for valuable methodological advice and to G. Manteuffel and B. Puppe for their critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Our special thanks go to R.K. Thomas for his assistance with the manuscript. Critical comments of the two anonymous reviewers are also appreciated. This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant F 1481/1–1 to H. Franz).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgeny Roitberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roitberg, E., Franz, H. Oddity learning by African dwarf goats ( Capra hircus). Anim Cogn 7, 61–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0190-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0190-y

Keywords

Navigation