Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex and species recognition by wild male southern white rhinoceros using contact pant calls

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognition of information from acoustic signals is crucial in many animals, and individuals are under selection pressure to discriminate between the signals of conspecifics and heterospecifics or males and females. Here, we first report that rhinos use information encoded in their calls to assess conspecifics and individuals of closely related species. The southern (Ceratotherium simum) and critically endangered northern (C. cottoni) white rhinos are the most social out of all the rhinoceros species and use a contact call pant. We found that southern white rhino pant calls provide reliable information about the caller’s sex, age class and social situation. Playback experiments on wild territorial southern white rhinoceros males revealed that they responded more strongly to the pant calls of conspecific females compared to the calls of other territorial males. This suggests that pant calls are more important form of communication between males and females than between territorial males. Territorial southern males also discriminated between female and territorial male calls of northern species and reacted more intensively to the calls of northern than southern males. This might be caused by a novelty effect since both species naturally live in allopatry. We conclude that white rhinos can directly benefit from assessing individuals at long distances using vocal cues especially because their eyesight is poor. Pant calls thus likely play a significant role in their social relationships and spatial organization. In addition, better understanding of vocal communication in white rhinos might be helpful in conservation management particularly because of their low reproduction in captivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubin T, Jouventin P (2002) Localisation of an acoustic signal in a noisy environment: the display call of the king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus. J Exp Biol 205:3793–3798

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2000) Economic models of animal communication. Anim Behav 59:259–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braune P, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E (2008) Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.). BMC Biol 6:19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton BD, Keating JL, Rengui L, Huang Y, Swaisgood RR (2010) Female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) chirps advertise the caller’s fertile phase. Proc R Soc B 277:1101–1106

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cinková I, Bičík V (2013) Social and reproductive behaviour of critically endangered northern white rhinoceros in a zoological garden. Mamm Biol 78:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinková I, Policht R (2014) Contact calls of the northern and southern white rhinoceros allow for individual and species identification. PLoS ONE 9:e98475

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cinková I, Policht R (2015) Discrimination of familiarity and sex from chemical cues in the dung by wild southern white rhinoceros. Anim Cogn 18:385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emslie R, Brooks M (1999) African Rhino. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC African Rhino Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 340:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2002) Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: influences of context, age, and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1465–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher HS, Swaisgood RR, Fitch-Snyder H (2003) Odor familiarity and female preferences for males in a threatened primate, the pygmy loris, Nycticebus pygmaeus: applications for genetic management of small populations. Naturwissenschaften 90:509–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Perani E (1997) Cooperative defense and intrasexual aggression in scops owls (Otus scops): responses to playback of male and female calls. J Raptor Res 31:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard J (1967) Home range, behaviour and recruitment rates of two black rhinoceros populations. East Afr Wildl J 5:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves CP, Fernando P, Robovský J (2010) The sixth rhino: a taxonomic re-assessment of the critically endangered northern white rhinoceros. PLoS ONE 5:e9703

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam J, Charrier I, Harcourt RG (2008) Vocal identity and species recognition in male Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea. J Exp Biol 211:2288–2295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes R, Hildebrandt TB, Blottner S, Walzer C, Silinski S, Patton ML, Wibbelt G, Schwarzenberger F, Göritz F (2005) Reproductive soundness of captive southern and northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum, C.s. cotttoni): evaluation of male genital tract morphology and semen quality before and after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 63:219–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes R, Hildebrandt TB, Walzer C, Göritz F, Patton ML, Silinski S, Anderson MJ, Reid CE, Wibbelt G, Tomasova K, Schwarzenberger F (2006) The effect of long non-reproductive periods on the genital health in captive female white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum, C.s. cottoni). Theriogenology 65:1492–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hick KG, Doucet SM, Mennill DJ (2015) Interspecific vocal discrimination in Neotropical wrens: responses to congeneric signals in sympatry and allopatry. Anim Behav 109:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman-Smith KM, Oyisenzoo M, Smith F (1986) A last chance to save the northern white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum cottoni. Oryx 20:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin DE, Price T (1999) Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82:347–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Siemers BM (2011) The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses. J Comp Physiol A 197:447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight M (2013) African Rhino Specialist Group report. Pachyderm 54:8–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight M (2015) African Rhino Specialist Group report. Pachyderm 56:10–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo N, Watanabe S (2009) Contact calls: information and social function. Jpn Psychol Res 51:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurie A (1982) Behavioural ecology of the Greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). J Zool 196:307–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemasson A, Boutin A, Boivin S, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M (2009) Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information. Anim Cogn 12:693–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindburg DG, Fitch-Snyder H (1994) Use of behaviour to evaluate reproductive problems in captive mammals. Zoo Biol 13:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann H (1982) African rhinoceros in captivity. Dissertation, Copenhagen University

  • Lingle S, Rendall D, Wilson WF, DeYoung RW, Pellis SM (2007) Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 2. Why mule deer help nonoffspring fawns. Anim Behav 73:907–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathevon N, Koralek A, Weldele M, Glickman SE, Theunissen FE (2010) What the hyena’s laugh tells: sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta. BMC Ecol 10:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K (1987) Roaring by red deer stags advances oestrus in hinds. Nature 330:648–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK (1992) Quantifying responses to playback: one, many, or composite multivariate measures? In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 79–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Peake TM (2000) Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour. Acta ethol 2:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Catchpole CK, Dabelsteen T, Falls JB, Fusani L, Gerhard C, Gilbert F, Horn AG, Klump GM, Kroodsma DE, Lambrechts MM, McComb KE, Nelson DA, Pepperberg IM, Ratcliffe L, Searcy WA, Weary DM (1992) Design of playback experiments: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW consensus. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 1–9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metrione LC, Penfold LM, Waring GH (2007) Social and spatial relationships in captive southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum). Zoo Biol 26:487–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mundry R, Fischer J (1998) Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P values: examples from animal behaviour. Anim Behav 56:256–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mundry R, Sommer C (2007) Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: consequences and an alternative. Anim Behav 74:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord TJ, Stamps JA (2009) Species identity cues in animal communication. Am Nat 174:585–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith RN (1973) The behavioural ecology of the white rhinoceros. Dissertation, Wisconsin University

  • Owen-Smith RN (1975) The social ethology of the white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum (Burchell 1817*). Z Tierpsychol 38:337–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith RN (1988) Megaherbivores. The influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owings DH, Morton ES (1998) Animal vocal communication: a new approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penny M (1987) Rhinos: an endangered species. Christopher Helm Publishers Limited, Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher BJ, Briefer EF, Vannoni E, McElligott AG (2014) Fallow bucks attend to vocal cues of motivation and fatigue. Behav Ecol 25:392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policht R, Tomášová K, Holečková D, Frynta D (2008) The vocal repertoire in northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni) as recorded in the last surviving herd. Bioacoustics 18:69–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Policht R, Karadžos A, Frynta D (2011) Comparative analysis of long-range calls in equid stallions (Equidae): Are acoustic parameters related to social organization? Afr Zool 46:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratajszczak R (2000) Poznan—Poland. EAZA News 31:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekwot PI, Ogwu D, Oyedipe EO, Sekoni VO (2001) The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci 65:157–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall D (2003) Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons. J Acoust Soc Am 113:3390–3402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein DI, Hack MA (1992) Hoarse signals: the sounds and scents of fury. Evol Ecol 6:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M, Kime N (2003) Selection on long-distance acoustic signals. In: Simmons A, Fay R, Popper A (eds) Springer handbook of auditory research, acoustic communication. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 225–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval L, Méndez C, Mennill DJ (2013) Different vocal signals, but not prior experience, influence heterospecific from conspecific discrimination. Anim Behav 85:907–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderová I, Policht R (2012) Acoustic analysis of the alarm call of the Anatolian ground squirrel Spermophilus xanthoprymnus: a description and comparison with alarm calls of the Taurus S. taurensis and European S. citellus ground squirrels. Naturwissenschaften 99:55–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader L, Hammerschmidt K (1997) Computer-aided analysis of acoustic parameters in animal vocalisations: a multi-parametric approach. Bioacoustics 7:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy W (1992) Measuring responses of female birds to male song. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 175–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader AM, Owen-Smith N (2002) The role of companionship in the dispersal of white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemers BM, Beedholm K, Dietz C, Dietz I, Ivanova T (2005) Is species identity, sex, age or individual quality conveyed by echolocation call frequency in European horseshoe bats? Acta Chiropt 7:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR (2007) Current status and future directions of applied behavioural research for animal welfare and conservation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 102:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Zhou X, Zhang G, Lindburg DG, Zhang H (2003) Application of behavioural knowledge to conservation in the giant panda. Int J Comp Psychol 16:65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Dickman DM, White AM (2006) A captive population in crisis: testing hypotheses for reproductive failure in captive-born southern white rhinoceros females. Biol Conserv 129:468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallet C, Linhart P, Policht R, Hammerschmidt K, Šimeček P, Kratinova P, Špinka M (2013) Encoding of situations in the vocal repertoire of piglets (Sus scrofa): a comparison of discrete and graded classifications. PLoS ONE 8:e71841

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tauck SA, Berardinelli JG (2007) Putative urinary pheromone of bulls involved with breeding performance of primiparous beef cows in a progestin-based estrous synchronization protocol. J Anim Sci 85:1669–1674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teichroeb LJ, Riede T, Kotrba R, Lingle S (2013) Fundamental frequency is key to response of female deer to juvenile distress calls. Behav Processes 92:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tripovich JS, Hall-Aspland S, Charrier I, Arnould JPY (2012) The behavioural response of Australian fur seals to motor boat noise. PLoS ONE 7:e37228

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E, Kroll N (1995) Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychon Bull Rev 2:387–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Gyseghem R (1984) Observations on the ecology and behaviour of the northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 49:348–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignal C, Mathevon N, Mottin S (2004) Audience drives male songbird response to partner’s voice. Nature 430:448–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (2003) Is there an ideal behavioural experiment? Anim Behav 66:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very thankful to the management and owners of all the wildlife reserves and zoos for kindly allowing IC to conduct field work there. We very much appreciate approval of this project, logistical help and support from the following people from the wildlife reserves: Jonathan Swart, Gerhardt Lorist, André Burger, Shaun McCartney, Anton Walker, Anthony Roberts, Hermann Müller, Elias Mangwane, Lucky Phiri, Louis Loock, Annelize Steyn, Johan Eksteen, Thomas Sikhwivhilu, Thompson Phakalane, Khanyisile Mbatha, and from the zoos: Jochen Lengger, Jiří Hrubý, Ivo Klika, Anton Freivolt, Markéta Horská and Martin Krug. We are very grateful to Vítězslav Bičík, Stanislav Bureš and Norman Owen-Smith for their support of this study and to the rhino keepers in the zoos for their kind assistance. The construction of the speaker by the late Pavel Krchňák and by Martin Deutschl is very much appreciated. IC would also like to express thanks to the wildlife reserves and zoo Dvůr Králové for providing accommodation. Nicolas Mathevon and three anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments, which helped improve the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the Palacký University in Olomouc PRF 2015-018 and by the mobility grants from the Palacký University to IC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Cinková.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

Playback experiments and recording of calls for this study were approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the National Zoological Gardens of South Africa (Project P11/03) and adhered to the “Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching” as published by the ASAB (2012). The project complies with the current laws of South Africa and the Czech Republic.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 489 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cinková, I., Policht, R. Sex and species recognition by wild male southern white rhinoceros using contact pant calls. Anim Cogn 19, 375–386 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0940-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0940-7

Keywords

Navigation