Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal landmarks: proximity prevails

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjects in conditioning experiments time their conditioned responses relative to the onsets of the conditioned stimuli (CSs). These onsets are temporal landmarks, by reference to which subjects may estimate the location of the unconditioned stimulus (US) in time. In a serial compound conditioning paradigm, a long duration CS comes on first, followed later by a second shorter CS, creating both a long-range and a short-range predictor of the US. We ask whether displacing the short-range predictor relative to the long-range predictor causes subjects to strike a compromise between the different temporal locations predicted by the two CSs. In three experiments with pigeons, we varied the training conditions so as to favor or militate against this outcome. However, in all conditions, there was no compromise; after the onset of the displaced short-range CS, the timing of conditioned responding was governed by it alone. This result contrasts with the compromises that are seen when the feeding time predicted by a CS is put in conflict with the time predicted by the circadian clock, and with the similar compromises sometimes seen when a nearby spatial landmark is displaced relative to a larger spatial context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng K (1989) The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process15:366–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett M, Harland D, Collett TS (2002) The use of landmarks and panoramic context in the performance of local vectors by navigating bees. J Exp Biol 205:807–814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

  • Gallistel CR (2002) Frequency, contingency and the information processing theory of conditioning. In: Sedelmeier P, Betsch T (eds) Etc. frequency processing and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp 153–171

  • Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2000) Time, rate and conditioning. Psychol Rev 107:289–344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon J (1977) Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's Law in animal timing. Psychol Rev 84:279–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon J, Fairhurst S, Goldberg B (1997) Cooperation, conflict and compromise between circadian and interval clocks in pigeons. In: Bradshaw ECM, Szabadi EE (eds) Time and behaviour: psychological and neurobehavioural analyses. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 329–384

  • Holland PC (1983) Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analyses of behavior: discrimination processes. Ballinger, New York, pp 183–206

  • Holland PC (1986) Temporal determinants of occasion setting in feature positive discriminations. Anim Learn Behav 14:11–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland PC, Hamlin PA, Parsons JP (1997) Temporal specificity in serial feature-positive discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 23:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig WK (1981) Working memory and the temporal map. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 167–197

  • Killeen PR, Weiss NA (1987) Optimal timing and the Weber function. Psychol Rev 94:455–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RR, Barnet RC (1993) The role of time in elementary associations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistlberger RE (1994) Circadian food-anticipatory activity: formal models and physiological mechanisms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 18:171–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savastano HI, Miller RR (1998) Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning. Behav Proc 44:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J, 27:379–423, 623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Bidwell NJ (1997) Visually mediated odometry in honeybees navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometery. J Exp Biol 200: 2513–2522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Grant MH14649 from the National Institute of Health (USA) to John Gibbon supported this research. The research was conducted in accord with the prior approval of the Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute and with all applicable animal care and welfare laws and regulations. The helpful comments and suggestions of Peter Balsam are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. R. Gallistel.

Additional information

John Gibbon died while this work was being prepared for publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fairhurst, S., Gallistel, C.R. & Gibbon, J. Temporal landmarks: proximity prevails. Anim Cogn 6, 113–120 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0169-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0169-8

Keywords

Navigation