Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of landmark properties in shaping exploration and navigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was aimed at uncovering physical and geometric properties that make a particular landmark a target of exploration and navigation. Rats were tested in a square open-field arena with additional portable corners featuring the same properties as the arena corners. It was found that the routes of progression converged upon the added corners, whether located at the arena wall or the arena center. Route convergence upon the added corners involved numerous visits to these corners. However, time spent at the added corners was relatively short compared with the arena corners, including that from which rats were introduced into the arena. There was no differential effect of testing rats in light or dark, or with a low versus a high portable corner. It is suggested that the added corners were distinct against the background of the arena enclosure, whereas the four arena corners and walls were encoded by the rats as one geometric module. This distinctness, together with the greater accessibility of the added corners, made them salient landmarks and a target of exploration. Thus, the impact of a landmark extended beyond its specific self-geometry to include accessibility and distinctness, which are contextual properties. In addition to the contextual impact on locomotor behavior there was also a temporal effect, with security initially dominating the rats’ behavior but then declining along with an increased attraction to salient landmarks. These spatiotemporal patterns characterized behavior in both lit and dark arenas, indicating that distal cues were secondary to local proximal cues in shaping routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alyan S, Jander R (1994) Short-range homing in the house mouse, Mus musculus: stages in the learning of directions. Anim Behav 48:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avni R, Zadicario E, Eilam D (2006) Exploration in a dark open field: a shift from directional to positional progression and a proposed model of acquiring spatial information. Behav Brain Res 171:313–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S (1998) Place navigation in mammals: a configuration-based model. Anim Cogn 1:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Gallistel CR (1984) Testing the geometric power of an animal’s spatial representation. In: Roitblat HL, Bever TG, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 409–423

  • Cheng K, Gallistel CR (2005) Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi and Polli (2004). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 31:254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Collett TS, Pickhard A, Wehner R (1987) The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 161:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BJ, Hines DJ, Hamilton DA, Whishaw IQ (2005) Movements of exploration intact in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behav Brain Res 163:91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark BJ, Hamilton DA, Whishaw IQ (2006) Motor activity (exploration) and formation of home bases in mice (c57bl/6) influenced by visual and tactile cues: modification of movement distribution, distance, location, and speed. Physiol Behav 87:805–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG, Tauro TL (1999) Object-goal positioning influences spatial representation in rats. Anim Cogn 2:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressant A, Muller RU, Poucet B (2002) Remapping of place cell firing patterns after maze rotations. Exp Brain Res 143:470–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diwadkar VA, McNamara TP (1997) Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychol Sci 8:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drai D, Kafkafi N, Benjamini Y, Elmer G, Golani I (2001) Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior. Behav Brain Res 125:133–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman S, Bulthoff HH (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three dimensional objects. Vision Res 32:2385–2400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D (2003) Open-field behavior withstands drastic changes in arena size. Behav Brain Res 142:53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D (2004) Locomotor activity in common spiny mice (Acomys cahirinuse): the effect of light and environmental complexity. BMC Ecol 4:16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Golani I (1989) Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment. Behav Brain Res 34:199–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Dank M, Maurer R (2003) Voles scale locomotion to the size of the open-field by adjusting the distance between stops: a possible link to path integration. Behav Brain Res 141:73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennaceur A, Michalikova S, Chazot PL (2006) Models of anxiety: responses of rats to novelty in an open space and an enclosed space. Behav Brain Res 171:26–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Joris-Lambert S, Dahn-Hurni C, Reverdin B (1995) Optimizing visual landmarks: two- and three-dimensional minimal landscapes. Anim Behav 49:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Maurer R, Georgakopoulos J, Griffin A (1999) Dead reckoning (path integration), landmarks, and representation of space in a comparative perspective. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. The Johns Hopkins University Press, London, pp 197–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer MA, Russo PV, Masten VL (1986) Multivariate assessment of locomotor behavior: pharmacological and behavioral analyses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:277–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golani I, Benjamini Y, Eilam D (1993) Stopping behavior: constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Behav Brain Res 53:21–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouteux S, Thinus-Blanc C, Vauclair J (2001) Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:505–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Fauria K, Collett TS (2003) The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants. J Exp Biol 206:535–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green CD (1995) All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 24:937–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hines DJ, Whishaw IQ (2005) Home bases formed to visual cues but not to self-movement (dead reckoning) cues in exploring hippocampectomized rats. Eur J Neurosci 22:2363–2375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman CM, Timberlake W, Leffel J, Gont R (1999) How is radial arm maze behavior in rats related to locomotor search tactics? Anim Learn Behav 27:426–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF, Schenk F (2003) Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 110:285–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth AE, Nadel L, Newcombe NS (2002) Children’s use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory. Psychol Sci 13:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor A, Jones PM, Good MA, Pearce JM (2006) Further evidence that rats relay on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: replay to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 32:314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris R (1984) Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 11:47–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien N, Lehmann H, Lecluse V, Mumby DG (2006) Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behav Brain Res 170:156–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parron C, Poucet B, Save E (2004) Entorhinal cortex lesions impair the use of distal but not proximal landmarks during place navigation in the rat. Behav Brain Res 154:345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus MP, Geyer MA (1997) Environment and unconditioned motor behavior: influences of drugs and environmental geometry on behavioral organization in rats. Psychobiology 25:327–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM, Good MA, Jones PM, McGregor A (2004) Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. J Exp Psychol J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 30:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poucet B, Herrmann T (2001) Exploratory patterns of rats on a complex maze provide evidence for topological coding. Behav Processes 53:155–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poucet B, Lenck-Santim PP, Paz-Villagran V, Save E (2003) Place cells, neocortex and spatial navigation: a short review. J Physiol Paris 97:537–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen S (2005) Rat’s behavior under chronic treatment of quinpirole following changes in open field. M.Sc. Dissertation submitted to Tel-Aviv University, Israel

  • Roullet P, Bozec G, Carton N (1998) Detection of object orientation and spatial changes by mice: importance of local views. Physiol Behav 64:203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simons DJ, Wang RF (1998) Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychol Sci 9:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skov-Rackette SI, Shettleworth SJ (2005) What do rats learn about the geometry of object arrays? Tests with exploratory behavior. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 31:142–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2007) How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces. Anim Cogn 10:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tchernichovski O, Benjamini Y, Golani I (1998) The dynamics of long-term exploration in the rat. Part I. A phase-plane analysis of the relationship between location and velocity. Biol Cybern 78:423–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thinus-Blanc C, Durup M, Poucet B (1992) The spatial parameters encoded by hamsters during exploration: a further study. Behav Processes 26:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang RF, Spelke ES (2002) Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci 6:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whishaw IQ, Gharbawie OM, Clark BJ, Lehmann H (2006) The exploratory behavior of rats in an open environment optimizes security. Behav Brain Res 171:230–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zadicario P, Avni R, Zadicario E, Eilam D (2005) ‘Looping’—an exploration mechanism in a dark open field. Behav Brain Res 159:27–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Tali Nitzan for help in the experiments, Reut Avni for comments, and Naomi Paz for editing the manuscript. This research was supported by ‘The Israel Science Foundation’, Grant 471/04. This study was carried out under permit L-05-049 of the ‘TAU Institutional ethics committee for animal experimentation’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, 69978, Israel

    Osnat Yaski & David Eilam

Authors
  1. Osnat Yaski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Eilam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Eilam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaski, O., Eilam, D. The impact of landmark properties in shaping exploration and navigation. Anim Cogn 10, 415–428 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0073-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation