Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tourism and flagship species in conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auffenberg W. 1981. The Behavioural Ecology of the Komodo Monitor. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. 1997. Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology 11: 69-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T. and O'Doherty G. 1999. On the use of surrogate species in conservation. Conservation Biology 13: 805-814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublin H.T. 1996. North-South Dissonance in Consumptive Use Policies: With Special Reference to Charismatic Megafauna. World Wide Fund for Nature, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle A. 2000. Flagships for the future? Oryx 34: 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin H. 1996. In pursuit of ecotourism. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 277-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin H.J. and Leader-Williams N. 2000. Protected area tourism-distorting conservation priorities towards charismatic megafauna? In: Entwistle A. and Dunstone N. (eds), Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had Its Day? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 257-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P. 1999. The tiger in human consciousness and its significance in crafting solutions for tiger conservation. In: Seidenstiker J., Christie S. and Jackson P. (eds), Riding the Tiger: Tiger Conservation in Human-Dominated Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 50-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams N. and Dublin H. 2000. Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In: Entwistle A. and Dunstone N. (eds),Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had Its Day? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 53-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas and keystones: is single-species management passe in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole M.J. 1997. Dragon tourism in Komodo National Park, Indonesia: its contribution to conservation and local development, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole M.J. and Goodwin H.J. 2000. Local economic impacts of dragon tourism in Indonesia. Annals of Tourism Research 27: 559-576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole M.J. and Goodwin H.J. 2001. Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation 28: 160-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole M.J., Goodwin H.J. and Ward K.G.R. 2001. Pricing policy for tourism in protected areas: lessons from Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Conservation Biology 15: 218-227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NS, Kent, UK

    Matthew J. Walpole & Nigel Leader-Williams

Authors
  1. Matthew J. Walpole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nigel Leader-Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walpole, M.J., Leader-Williams, N. Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 543–547 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014864708777

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014864708777

Keywords

Search

Navigation