Skip to main content
Log in

Young-boy networks without kin clusters in a lek-mating manakin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I use 10 years of data from a long-term study of lek-mating long-tailed manakins to relate the social network among males to their spatial and genetic structure. Previously, I showed that the network connectivity of young males predicts their future success. Here, I ask whether kinship might shape the organization of this “young-boy network”. Not surprisingly, males that were more socially distant (linked by longer network paths) were affiliated with perch zones (lek arenas) that were further apart. Relatedness (r) among males within the network decreased as social distance increased, as might be expected under kin selection. Nevertheless, any role for indirect inclusive fitness benefits is refuted by the slightly negative mean relatedness among males at all social distances within the network (overall mean r = −0.06). That is, relatedness ranged from slightly negative (−0.04) to more negative (−0.2). In contrast, relatedness in dyads for which at least one of the males was outside the social network (involving at least one blood-sampled male not documented to have interacted with other banded males) was slightly above the random expectation (mean r = 0.05). The slight variations around r = 0 among males of different categories likely reflect dispersal dynamics, rather than any influence of kinship on social organization. Relatedness did not covary with the age difference between males. These results, together with previous results for lack of relatedness between alpha and beta male partners, refute any role for kin selection in the evolution of cooperative display in this lek-mating system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Croft DP, James R, Thomas POR, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet SM, McDonald DB, Foster MS, Clay RP (2007) Plumage development and molt in Long-tailed Manakins, Chiroxiphia linearis: variation according to sex and age. Auk 124:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Pires D, Delaney KS, Wayne RK (2005) Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups. Mol Ecol 14:4453–4459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT, Lindell J (1999) Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:813–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CR (1998) Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecol 70:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • James R, Croft DP, Krause J (2009) Potential banana-skins in animal social network analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0742-5

  • Knoke D, Kuklinski JH (1982) Network analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Lindstrom J (1996) Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? Proc R Soc Lond B 263:919–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer AH (2005) Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature 434:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Lusseau D, James R (2009) Animal social networks: an introduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0747-0

  • Loiselle BA, Ryder TB, Durães R, Tori W, Blake JG, Parker PG (2007) Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species. Behav Ecol 18:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D (2007) Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network. Evol Ecol 21:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (1989a) Cooperation under sexual selection: age-graded changes in a lekking bird. Am Nat 134:709–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (1989b) Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male-male cooperation. Anim Behav 37:1007–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (1993a) Demographic consequences of sexual selection in the long-tailed manakin. Behav Ecol 4:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (1993b) Delayed plumage maturation and orderly queues for status: a manakin mannequin experiment. Ethol 94:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (2003) Microsatellite DNA evidence for gene flow in Neotropical lek-mating Long-tailed Manakins. Condor 105:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10910–10914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB, Potts WK (1994) Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science 266:1030–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DB, Potts WK, Fitzpatrick JW, Woolfenden GE (1999) Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays. Proc R Soc London B 266:1117–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401:155–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evol 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey L, Piertney S, Stone J, Höglund J (2000) Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature 408:352–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson K, Zelen M (1989) Rethinking centrality: methods and examples. Soc Netw 11:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainer JM, McDonald DB (1995) Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ (2003) Six degrees: the science of a connected age. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Lusseau D (2006) A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals. Biol Letters 2:497–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

L. Kelly, M. MacGregor, T. Parchman, L. Throop, J. Whiteman, and two anonymous reviewers made very useful comments. J. and J. Stuckey of Monteverde provided support and access to their land, and the people and government of Costa Rica created an environment conducive to intensive field research. J. Gilardi, R. Clay, numerous field assistants, and Earthwatch volunteers helped make the necessary observations. Funding came from the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, the National Geographic Society, and the Earthwatch Institute. All banding and blood sampling complied with the appropriate regulations for Costa Rica.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. McDonald.

Additional information

Communicated by Guest Editor D. Lusseau

This contribution is part of the special issue “Social Networks: new perspectives” (Guest Editors: J. Krause, D. Lusseau, and R. James).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, D.B. Young-boy networks without kin clusters in a lek-mating manakin. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1029–1034 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0722-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0722-9

Keywords

Navigation