Skip to main content
Log in

Orientation in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis: response versus place learning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that mammals, birds and fish use comparable spatial learning strategies. Unfortunately, except in insects, few studies have investigated spatial learning mechanisms in invertebrates. Our study aimed to identify the strategies used by cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) to solve a spatial task commonly used with vertebrates. A new spatial learning procedure using a T-maze was designed. In this maze, the cuttlefish learned how to enter a dark and sandy compartment. A preliminary test confirmed that individual cuttlefish showed an untrained side-turning preference (preference for turning right or left) in the T-maze. This preference could be reliably detected in a single probe trial. In the following two experiments, each individual was trained to enter the compartment opposite to its side-turning preference. In Experiment 1, distal visual cues were provided around the maze. In Experiment 2, the T-maze was surrounded by curtains and two proximal visual cues were provided above the apparatus. In both experiments, after acquisition, strategies used by cuttlefish to orient in the T-maze were tested by creating a conflict between the formerly rewarded algorithmic behaviour (turn, response learning) and the visual cues identifying the goal (place learning). Most cuttlefish relied on response learning in Experiment 1; the two strategies were used equally often in Experiment 2. In these experiments, the salience of cues provided during the experiment determined whether cuttlefish used response or place learning to solve this spatial task. Our study demonstrates for the first time the presence of multiple spatial strategies in cuttlefish that appear to closely parallel those described in vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade C, Alwarshetty M, Sudha S, Suresh Chandra J (2001) Effect of innate direction bias on T-maze learning in rats: implications for research. J Neurosci Methods 110:31–35 DOI 10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00415-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou S, Poucet B (1996) A comparative analysis of spatial memory processes. Behav Processes 35:113–126 DOI 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00060-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal JG (1996) A review of simultaneous visual discrimination as a method of training octopuses. Biol Rev 71:157–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boal JG, Dunham AW, Williams KT, Hanlon RT (2000) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides). J Comp Psychol 114(3):246–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boletzky SV (1972) A note on aerial prey-capture by Sepia officinalis (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Vie Milieu 23(1A):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU (1994) Cephalopod sense organs, nerves and the brain: adaptations for high performance and life style. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 25:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RA, Kuba M, Griebel U (2002) Lateral asymmetry of eye use in Octopus vulgaris. Anim Behav 64:461-468 DOI 10.1006/anbe.2002.3089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RA, Kuba MJ, Meisel DV (2004) Lateralized eye use in Octopus vulgaris shows antisymmetrical distribution. Anim Behav 68(5):1107–1114 DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.11.027

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman HM, Mactutus CF (2001) Proximal versus distal cue utilization in spatial navigation: the role of visual acuity?. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78:332–346 DOI 10.1006/nlme.2002.4062

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo PJ, Brightwell JJ, Countryman RA (2003) Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-Binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J Neurosci 23(8):3547–3554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudchenko PA (2001) How do animals actually solve the T maze?. Behav Neurosci 115(4):850-860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz MO, Mallot HA (2000) Biomimetic robot navigation. Robot Auton Syst 30:133–153 DOI 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00069-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson BM, Shettleworth SJ (2005) Place versus response learning revisited: tests of blocking on the radial maze. Behav Neurosci 119(2):567–586 DOI 10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.567

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Capaldi EA (1999) Vectors, routes and maps: New discoveries about navigation in insects. Trends Neurosci 22:237–242 DOI 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01406-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG (1999) Wayfinding behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1996) Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy S (1998) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LF (2003) The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain Behav Evol 62:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karson MA (2003) Simultaneous discrimination learning and its neural correlates in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda: Mollusca). Doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

  • Karson MA, Boal JG, Hanlon RT (2003) Experimental evidence for spatial learning in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J Comp Psychol 117(2):149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman RAW (1981) Lateralized asymmetry of behavior in animals at the population and individual level. Behav Brain Sci 4:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López JC, Broglio C, Rodríguez F, Thinus-Blanc C, Salas C (1999) Multiple spatial learning strategies in goldfish (Carassius auratus) Anim Cogn 2:109–120 DOI 10.1007/s100710050031

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather JA (1991) Navigation by spatial memory and use of visual landmarks in octopuses. J Comp Physiol A 168:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather JA (1995) Cognition in cephalopods. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT (eds) Advances in the study of behavior vol 24. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, pp 317–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Messenger JB (1968) The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav 16:342–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee L, Braithwaite VA (2003) The influence of habitat stability on landmark use during spatial learning in the three-spined stickleback. Anim Behav 65:701–707 DOI 10.1006/anbe.2003.2082

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard A (1972) Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 47:241–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packard MG, McGaugh JL (1996) Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65(1):65–72 DOI 10.1006/nlme.1996.0007

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle F (1957) Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the “place-vs-response” question. Psychol Rev 64:217–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders GD (1975) The Cephalopods. In: Corning WC, Dyal JA, Willows AOD (eds) Invertebrate learning vol 3. Plenium Press, New York, pp 1–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A (1999) Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res Rev 30(2):164–175 DOI 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00012-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JJ, Longo N, Bitterman ME (1970) The octopus in the laboratory. Handling, maintenance, training. Behav Res Methods Instrum 2(1):15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Lehrer M, Harvey WR (1996) Navigation: migration and homing, vol 199. Company of Biologists Limited, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MJ (1964) Detour experiments with octopuses. J Exp Biol 41:621–642

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. J. Lejeune for statistical advice and the staff of the C.R.E.C. for their technical assistance. This research was supported by a grant from the Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie to C.A. The experiments complied with the French animal testing laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludovic Dickel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alves, C., Chichery, R., Boal, J.G. et al. Orientation in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis: response versus place learning. Anim Cogn 10, 29–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0027-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0027-6

Keywords

Navigation