Abstract
In the present research, we asked whether pigeons tended to judge time intervals not only in terms of their absolute value but also relative to a duration from which they must be discriminated (i.e., longer or shorter). Pigeons were trained on two independent temporal discriminations. In one discrimination, sample durations of 2 and 8 sec were associated with, for example, red and green hue comparisons, respectively, and in the other discrimination, sample durations of 4 and 16 sec were associated with vertical and horizontal line comparisons, respectively. If pigeons are trained on a temporal discrimination and tested with intermediate durations, the subjective midpoint typically occurs close to the geometric mean of the two trained values. The 4- and 8-sec values were selected to be the geometric mean of the two values in the other discrimination. When a 4-sec test sample was presented with the comparisons from the 2- and 8-sec discrimination, the pigeons preferred the comparison associated with the shorter sample. Similarly, when an 8-sec test sample was presented with the comparisons from the 4-and 16-sec discrimination, the pigeons preferred the comparison associated with the longer sample. Thus, a relative grouping effect was found. That is, durations that should have produced indifferent choice were influenced by their relative durations (shorter than or longer than the alternative) during training.
Article PDF
References
Church, R. M., &Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 216–228.
Flaherty, C. F. (1996).Incentive relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbon, J. (1986). The structure of subjective time: How time flies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 105–135). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kraemer, P. J., Brown, R. W., &Randall, C. K. (1995). Signal intensity and duration estimation in rats.Behavioural Processes,34, 265–268.
Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., &Brown, R. W. (1997). The influence of stimulus attributes on duration matching-to-sample in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,25, 148–157.
Machado, A., &Keen, R. (1999). Learning to time (LeT) or scalar expectancy theory (SET)? A critical test of two models of timing.Psychological Science,10, 285–290.
Meck, W. H. (1983). Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 171–201.
Roberts, S., &Church, R. M. (1978). Control of an internal clock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 311–337.
Stubbs, D. A. (1976). Scaling of stimulus duration by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,26, 15–25.
Zentall, T. R., &Clement, T. S. (2002). Memory mechanisms in pigeons: Evidence of base-rate neglect.Journal of Experiment Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,28, 111–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH-59194.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zentall, T.R., Weaver, J.E. & Clement, T.S. Pigeons group time intervals according to their relative duration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 113–117 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206469
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206469