Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Research updateSuricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency
Section snippets
Preditor-specific alarm calls
Suricates are diurnal, cooperatively breeding mongooses that inhabit open semi-desert areas in groups of three to 33 individuals. They forage for five to eight hours per day, typically at a distance of 20–50 m from the nearest burrow or shelter [11]. Foraging animals frequently scan their surroundings for predators (Fig. 1). Group members also alternate guarding from a raised sentinel position [12].
Guards and foraging individuals emit several different alarm calls when they spot a predator.
Acoustic analysis
Of the calls recorded, 254 were of sufficiently high quality to permit acoustic analysis. To control for individual variation, calls were drawn from at least six different subjects for each call type (the average number of subjects was 12, and the maximum was 15). Only one call per individual and predator encounter was used in analysis. Canary software [14], Signal software (Engineering Design, Belmont, MA, USA), and LMA software [15] were used to measure 28 different acoustic parameters that
Call responses
In the field, suricates were played alarm calls in the absence of actual predators and their responses were filmed. Playback of alarm calls given to different predators elicited significantly different responses, duplicating behavior seen under natural conditions. In response to playback of mammalian predator alarm calls, subjects moved rapidly in the direction of the loudspeaker while scanning the area. They typically gathered together 5–10 m away from the loudspeaker and then retreated toward
Motivational vocalizations
Acoustically different alarm calls are believed to have evolved in species in which individuals are attacked by a variety of different predators, each of which demands a different escape strategy 17, 18. Because suricates are preyed upon by species with different hunting techniques, selection may have favored an alarm call repertoire that encodes information about predator type in addition to level of urgency. By contrast, many ground squirrels and marmots escape from all predators in the same
References (21)
The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Reprinted 1981)
(1871)Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence for predator classification and semantic communication
Science
(1980)Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate
J. Comp. Psychol.
(1999)The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates
Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci.
(2001)Semantics of an avian alarm call system: the male domestic fowl, Gallus domesticus
Behaviour
(1987)What is communicated in the antipredator calls of lemurs: evidence from antipredator call playbacks to ringtailed and ruffed lemurs
Ethology
(1990)Local variation in Barbary macaque shrill barks
Anim. Behav.
(1995)On the origin of speech from animal sounds
Vocal correlates of emotion
Animal signals: motivational, referential, or both?
Cited by (190)
Acquisition of predator knowledge in sooty mangabeys
2023, Animal BehaviourMeerkat manners: Endocrine mediation of female dominance and reproductive control in a cooperative breeder
2022, Hormones and BehaviorEffects of alarm call playback on the behaviour of wild European herring gulls
2021, Learning and MotivationCitation Excerpt :Alarm calls in social species provide group members with information about potential threats and give animals an opportunity to respond appropriately in advance of having detected these for themselves (Lönnstedt, McCormick, Meekan, Ferrari, & Chivers, 2012; Manser, Seyfarth, & Cheney, 2002).
Mindshaping and Non-Gricean Approaches to Language Evolution
2024, Review of Philosophy and Psychology