Metadata 20/20: Principles, personas and practices for richer open scholarly metadata

December 2019

Metadata 20/20: Principles, personas and practices for richer open scholarly metadata

Metadata 20/20 was an international, community-led initiative bringing together researchers, publishers, librarians, funders, data repositories, and service providers around a shared goal: richer, more connected, more reusable, and more open metadata for all research outputs. The outcomes page collects the full set of deliverables from the initiative’s three phases.

Strategists

Understand why richer metadata is a community problem β€” and a community opportunity. The principles and use cases that make the case for investing in metadata quality across the scholarly ecosystem.

Decision-makers

Know what good metadata practice looks like for your role. Personas across six stakeholder communities β€” researchers, publishers, librarians, funders, data repositories, and platforms β€” clarify what each group needs from metadata and what each can contribute.

Practitioners

Apply the practices, evaluation frameworks, and best practices guidance. Concrete implementation guidance drawn from a multi-stakeholder survey (211 responses from 23 countries), a peer-reviewed literature review, and a 2019 workathon.

What the initiative produced

  • Metadata principles β€” aspirational guidelines for improving research communications, discoverability, and reuse across the community
  • Metadata personas β€” role-based constructs for six stakeholder communities, identifying what each needs from metadata and how each can contribute
  • Metadata practices β€” implementation guidance to help each persona act on the principles
  • Use cases β€” real-world challenges and opportunities that illustrate the cost of poor metadata and the value of richer records
  • Literature review β€” a peer-reviewed synthesis of the metadata landscape, published in RIO Journal
  • Multi-stakeholder survey β€” 211 responses from 23 countries exploring metadata awareness and attitudes (2019)
  • Evaluation framework β€” approaches for assessing and improving metadata quality
  • Workathon proceedings β€” outputs from the September 2019 community event on metadata change management
  • Methods paper β€” documentation of the community-based process used to develop the principles and personas

Explore the outcomes

Authors

Explore

Explore the outputs
Published
30 December 2019

Page maintainer: Ginny Hendricks
Last updated: 2019-December-30