Now is the time to work together toward open infrastructures for scholarly metadata

October 2021

Now is the time to work together toward open infrastructures for scholarly metadata

The closure of Microsoft Academic β€” and its 170 million records not covered by Crossref β€” was a wake-up call for the scholarly community. Published on the LSE Impact Blog in October 2021, this piece draws lessons from that moment and makes the case for open, collectively governed, and sustainable metadata infrastructure.

Strategists

Understand why open scholarly infrastructure is fragile β€” and what makes it resilient. How the loss of Microsoft Academic revealed gaps in coverage, governance, and sustainability, and why POSI offers a framework for building something more durable.

Decision-makers

Know what your organisation should commit to. A direct call to action for publishers, funders, institutions, and infrastructure providers β€” and why mandating open, FAIR metadata is essential to the health of the scholarly record.

Practitioners

See the gaps and how to fill them. What the Microsoft Academic coverage data revealed about grey literature and Global South scholarship, and how open metadata workflows and full-text access can address those gaps.

What this piece covers

  • The Microsoft Academic closure β€” what was lost, and what the coverage gap revealed about equity and representation in open scholarly infrastructure
  • Four lessons learned β€” why metadata infrastructure must be POSI-compliant, collaborative, supported by systematic policy, and paired with open full-text access
  • A call to action for each stakeholder group:
    • Publishers β€” deposit complete metadata (references, abstracts) in open infrastructures; support the Initiatives for Open Citations and Open Abstracts
    • Researchers β€” choose journals that offer open access to both full text and complete, validated metadata
    • Funding agencies β€” mandate that metadata from funded research be made openly available
    • Institutions and libraries β€” require complete, open metadata availability in contracts with publishers
    • Infrastructure and service providers β€” simplify metadata deposition for smaller publishers with limited technical capacity
    • Metadata disseminators β€” ensure enriched metadata is openly available with full provenance using common standards and open licences

Read the article

Authors

  • Ginny Hendricks
  • Bianca Kramer
  • Catriona J. Maccallum
  • Paolo Manghi
  • Cameron Neylon
  • Silvio Peroni
  • David Shotton
  • Aaron Tay
  • Ludo Waltman

Explore

Read on LSE Impact Blog
Published
27 October 2021

Page maintainer: Ginny Hendricks
Last updated: 2021-October-27